My music has undergone much change and development through the years. As a conservatory student, I wrote in what might be described as a neo-expressionistic (influenced by such composers as Mahler, Schoenberg and Berg) kind of style. Soon I discovered the experimental composers of the New York School, and though I could never fully embrace the kind of total objectivity as espoused by composers like John Cage, this tradition became my new point of reference. Shortly after moving to France, I began to grow tired of trying to reconcile myself with certain aspects of experimentalism (the self-denial, the highly conjectural and detached world-philosophy); it was around this time that I began to turn to North and South American folk music for inspiration.

Towards the end of my time in France I began to work in the microtonal 6th-tone scale. I had been a longtime admirer of the great microtonal composer Harry Partch, and as much as I studied and admired his writings on Just Intonation, what appealed to me most about Partch was the depth and poetry of his music itself. My reason for wanting to work with microtones was none other than to allow myself more possibilities, more options than those given to me by the conventional system of 12-Tone-Equal-Temperament. It's easy to see why a painter, if given a palette of 12 predetermined colors, would eventually want to mix the colors together, find different shades, etc. The 6th-tone scale gave me 36 tones to the octave, three times more than in the conventional system; this has allowed me the possibility to work with certain hues found between the tones/“colors” to which we've become so accustomed. As esoteric and technical as such a thing may sound, working in the 6th-tone scale seemed to open the way in my music to a kind of expressive immediacy that I don't think would have otherwise been possible; my musical world became more vivid than ever before.

H O M E